<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this post illegal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newslab.org/2009/11/03/is-this-post-illegal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newslab.org/2009/11/03/is-this-post-illegal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:34:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.newslab.org/2009/11/03/is-this-post-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newslab.org/?p=1547#comment-722</guid>
		<description>How about the use of AP and/or NewsCorp material on blogs or websites or in e-zines and e-letters that are pure nonprofits -- are absent any advertising that covers any part of costs and/or that receive no contributions to help cover costs?

And where DOES the fair use of material under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 fit within Curley&#039;s and Murdoch&#039;s veiled (or is that unveiled?) threats?  Perhaps the AP should be more concerned about what the Tribune Corporation has on its calendar -- a plan to utilize as little content from the Associated Press as practical during the week of Nov. 8 to see if its breaking ties with the AP next year is sensible and practicle.  (It seems from here that it ain&#039;t, that is more in the order of suicidal continuation of cost-cutting measures that are helping drive away subscribers -- and, therefore, advertisers -- even faster than competition from other news sources and the lousy economy are doing.)

So -- where might the big boys leave little me?  http://www.mytown.ca/green-dog/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the use of AP and/or NewsCorp material on blogs or websites or in e-zines and e-letters that are pure nonprofits &#8212; are absent any advertising that covers any part of costs and/or that receive no contributions to help cover costs?</p>
<p>And where DOES the fair use of material under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 fit within Curley&#8217;s and Murdoch&#8217;s veiled (or is that unveiled?) threats?  Perhaps the AP should be more concerned about what the Tribune Corporation has on its calendar &#8212; a plan to utilize as little content from the Associated Press as practical during the week of Nov. 8 to see if its breaking ties with the AP next year is sensible and practicle.  (It seems from here that it ain&#8217;t, that is more in the order of suicidal continuation of cost-cutting measures that are helping drive away subscribers &#8212; and, therefore, advertisers &#8212; even faster than competition from other news sources and the lousy economy are doing.)</p>
<p>So &#8212; where might the big boys leave little me?  <a href="http://www.mytown.ca/green-dog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mytown.ca/green-dog/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
